Updates: Eviction/departure day for “Nickelsville” encampment

FIRST REPORT AT 9:31 AM: From photojournalist Matt Durham, who is staking out the “Nickelsville” site at Terminal 107 Park this morning for WSB: Nothing’s happened yet; encampment residents are gathering at any moment for a meeting. Matt says they’re still expecting that police won’t show up before noon. Some appear to be packing. (We’ll add updates to this item until and unless the encampment starts to clear out – whether that’s voluntarily or unvoluntarily – at which time we’ll start a new report.) Side note: Fellow independent neighborhood-news site Queen Anne View covered the SHARE/WHEEL sleepout at Councilmember Tim Burgess‘s house last night, followup to the Monday night protest in Mayor Nickels‘ North Admiral neighborhood – see the QAV report here.

10:13 AM UPDATE: From Matt – Encampment residents have concluded their meeting and reported that they have four people who are willing to get arrested (that compares to 25 in the sweep at a different site a year ago). They now also believe police are likely to arrive closer to 1 pm.

12:05 PM UPDATE: Some residents have departed. No major police activity yet. (Meantime, re: the SHARE/WHEEL sleepout protest, they say they’ll be back at Burgess’s house tonight.) We’ll be starting an afternoon report shortly.

12:19 PM UPDATE: But first – a statement just in from the Port of Seattle:

Port of Seattle officials expressed regret that some members of the homeless encampment known as ‘Nickelsville’ have thus far refused to leave port property voluntarily. The group set up the encampment on port property without permission and has been at the public park illegally for 69 days. The group’s presence violates city land use and shoreline codes as well as prohibitions against camping and lighting fires within the City of Seattle. In addition, the Port of Seattle does not have the authority to provide land for housing or housing purposes.

Nickelsville organizers and residents have been given multiple warnings that if they did not leave by September 30th, they would be subject to arrest for trespassing. Many residents are choosing to leave, seeking help from resources offered throughout the county. Encampment organizers issued invitations Tuesday to other tent cities across the region to join with them in choosing to be arrested to send a political message about the larger issue of homelessness in our community. While the port respects the right to civil disobedience, encampment members have been asked repeatedly to leave voluntarily.

“The port has worked diligently with Nickelsville and community leaders to find safe and legal options for the residents,” said CEO Tay Yoshitani. “Our first concern remains the health and safety of the men and women of the camp, and I’m relieved tohear that many of the original residents are now using our community’s network of shelters and support services.”

Port commissioners and staff members have worked for more than two months with members of the Nickelsville leadership, its supporters, and members of the faith community to facilitate efforts to find safe and legal shelter for those individuals who want it. Instead, Nickelsville organizers have pursued a permanent site with plans for hundreds of people. Over the past year, both the state and the city have rejected their request for permanent sites, and the City of Seattle has communicated repeatedly that a permanent Nickelsville encampment will not be allowed.

Despite consistent communication from the port that their presence was illegal and would not be tolerated, as recently as Monday organizers reiterated their request to stay an additional 90 days and their desire to extend that agreement on an ongoing basis.

The port has repeatedly stated that the Terminal 107 public park is not an appropriate location for housing or an encampment. Independent of the numerous code violations, there are not acceptable human services and hygiene facilities and lacks access to public transportation.

1 PM UPDATE: Matt Durham reports more Port police arriving at Nickelsville. Further updates will be in a new story.

10 Replies to "Updates: Eviction/departure day for "Nickelsville" encampment"

  • brokemamma September 30, 2009 (9:39 am)

    such a crappy catch 22….. i personally don’t think it’s been a problem- who cares. I will say that i feel SAFER walking the path since the camp has been there. i know that there are people around and not just the possibility of a weirdo waiting in the bushes for me. and if one of them happened to be a weirdo waiting in the bushes-at least there would be others to come running when i scream!

    this location is better than a church parking lot w/ little kids around. my children have visited tent cities w/ school- when they were learning about homes in general.

  • West Seattle September 30, 2009 (10:26 am)

    ” not just the possibility of a weirdo waiting in the bushes for me.”

    Or he may be one of the level 3 child rapists SHARE likes to harbor:

    http://www.myballard.com/2009/09/14/sex-offender-removed-from-share-shelter/

  • TK September 30, 2009 (10:45 am)

    Question: What about federal parks? Can people “camp out” as long as they want at a federal park? Seems ridiculous that a person cannot be Homeless these days. As if our grand parents didn’t all live in Hooverville back during the Great Depression anyway. C’mon!

  • SorryButNo September 30, 2009 (11:18 am)

    TK, this group is not about being homeless as much as it is about trying to grab free land to set up a permanent camp (on everyone else’s dime, btw). It’s a scam.

    There are other groups out there that are trying to effect real change. They deserve support.

  • brokemamma September 30, 2009 (11:20 am)

    well- i guess i’ll have to walk WITH my children instead of letting them go on their nightly walk through the industrial district… on the water….in the dark….

    i get it- i really do. i am not a fan of sex offenders (not the public urination offenders) being in my neighborhood…. but we’re all here on this earth together… might as well lend a hand, as there will be a time when you’re looking for one. If you don’t look for one- then bless you and do something nice just because

  • Truth Detector September 30, 2009 (12:25 pm)

    Brokemamma,

    Your sense of security is unfounded.

    Not only will none of these people come to your aid if you were attacked it is likely that the person attacking you was a resident in the encampment.

    There is evidence that members of these SHARE run encampments have committed all kinds of crimes from robbery to rape to murder. SHARE not only does nothing to screen these people out, they actively work to hide them from you and your community.

    This is a squaters camp, pure and simple, and has nothing to do with homelessness.

  • jiggers September 30, 2009 (1:01 pm)

    Ignorance goes far behind the mask and keyboard pads here.

  • ProudPugetRidger September 30, 2009 (1:06 pm)

    Truth Detector, your statement is painfully blunt…but seemingly spot-on accurate.
    .
    It will be fascinating to investigate the actual arrested individuals’ history. I have a strong hunch that the persons who are arrested will have little, if any, history of actually living in the encampment. Sadly, the manipulators of the whole program place themselves in a pseudo homeless position in order bolster their own agenda. Meanwhile, the real homeless people will squander off into the alleys while all the commotion is taking place.
    .
    We will never know the extent of illegal aliens, Registered Sex Offenders, persons with outstanding warrants, drug/alcohol addicts, and folks with similar indiscretions who have been hiding within the encampment. Even sadder, these folks (who legitimately need our help) will be overlooked as the SHARE illusionists gobble up all precious resources that should directly toward resolving the legitimate homeless issue(s).
    .
    At the end of the day, too may people will unfairly remember the Port of Seattle’s actions as the actual problem, completely unaware of just how much effort the POS endured on the homeless people’s behalf during the prior 69-day period.
    .
    Helping destitute individuals directly to overcome their obstacles is a very worthy and noble cause. However, after careful consideration and research, I’ve reached the conclusion that supporting the selfish goals of the SHARE program is downright irresponsible.
    .
    I learned a lot during these last few months. I also sincerely wish the best of luck upon those less fortunate individuals who continue to struggle toward a better life.

  • Jim September 30, 2009 (1:07 pm)

    “Seems ridiculous that a person cannot be Homeless these days. As if our grand parents didn’t all live in Hooverville back during the Great Depression anyway.”

    Strange perspective on social progress.

  • David September 30, 2009 (2:08 pm)

    Jim – Like many in America, I’ve moved twice across the country to seek a better life and atmosphere; why do you assume our grandparents were even in the PNW/Seattle. You must have a very schewed sense of perspective (typical of local seattleites). My grand parents did not live in Hooverville. They kept their collective heads together, worked hard and kept food on the table. My father grew up with chickens and rabbits in the back garden that help feed the family. My mother was luckier to have guardians that did not get wiped out by the market.

Sorry, comment time is over.